ClarityIQ
Tecnologia di imaging di alta qualità a bassa dose
ClarityIQ
Tecnologia di imaging di alta qualità a bassa dose
ClarityIQ, disponibile sui sistemi Azurion, utilizza algorimi di elaborazione delle immagini in tempo reale e tecnologia del computer per ottimizzare la qualità delle immagini.
Utilizza gli algoritmi di elaborazione delle immagini in tempo reale progettati per migliorare la qualità delle immegini
Consente di elaborare le immagini senza alcun ritardo significativo tra l'acquisizione e la visualizzazione
Minore sfocatura da movimento in strutture in rapido movimento come il cuore e il tratto gastrointestinale
Caratteristiche
Alta qualità, dose estremamente bassa
La tecnologia ClarityIQ riduce drasticamente la dose di radiazioni, con conseguente riduzione di complicanze dall'esposizione alle radiazioni dei pazienti [1-39, a,b]. Consente l'esecuzione di procedure più lunghe per trattare pazienti obesi e ad alto rischio [1-39, a,b]. ClarityIQ riduce la radiazione di dispersione e quindi anche i rischi per la salute sul lungo termine per i medici e il personale [1-39, a,b]. A oggi, molteplici studi clinici su più di 21.275 pazienti [1-39, a] sono stati pubblicati sulla tecnologia ClarityIQ, svelando un'unica verità: dose significativamente più bassa in tutte le aree cliniche per pazienti e operatori [1-39, a].
Visibilità vascolare migliore
ClarityIQ utilizza un filtro spaziale avanzato per evidenziare le strutture e ridurre l'impatto del rumore di fondo in un'immagine. Le funzionalità di elaborazione parallela ad alta velocità migliorano il filtraggio in tempo reale. Il risultato è un'eccezionale visualizzazione delle strutture clinicamente rilevanti a livelli notevolmente bassi di dose di radiazione del detettore, risultando particolarmente utile per i casi endovascolari.
Minore sfocatura da movimento
Per permettere di ridurre la dose di radiazione senza perdere informazioni clinicamente rilevanti nell'anatomia cardiaca dinamica, la tecnologia ClarityIQ sfrutta una nuova funzione di compensazione del movimento. Riduce la sfocatura solamente su parte di un'immagine di oggetti in movimento, come il cuore e il tratto gastrointestinale, migliorando così la qualità dell'immagine. L'aspetto delle immagini cardiache può essere regolato durante l'installazione in base alle preferenze dell'utente.
Prodotti correlati
Disclaimer
[a] In 39 studi comparativi singoli, Philips ClarityIQ è stato associato a riduzione nell'esposizione dei pazienti alle radiazioni. Rif.1-39. [b] Rapporto tra esposizione alle radiazioni e rischio di complicanze, rischi per la salute nel lungo termine, durata della procedura e caratteristiche del paziente, complessità della procedura, secondo quanto indicato nelle linee guida mediche (Stecker, M.S., et al., Guidelines for Patient Radiation Dose Management. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2009. 20(7): p. S263-S273).
[1] Balter, S., et al., Novel radiation dose reduction fluoroscopic technology facilitates chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions. EuroIntervention, 2017.13(12): p. e1468-e1474. [2] Bracken, J.A., et al., A Radiation Dose Reduction Technology to Improve Patient Safety During Cardiac Catheterization Interventions. J Interv Cardiol, 2015. 28(5): p. 493-7. [3] Busse, T., J. Reifart, and N. Reifart, Influence of novel X-ray imaging technology on radiation exposure during chronic total occlusion procedures. Catheter CardiovascInterv, 2018. 92(7): p. 1268-1273.
[4] Buytaert, D., et al., Evaluation of patient and staff exposure with state of the art x ray technology in cardiac catheterization: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 2018. 31(6): p. 807-814. [5] ten Cate, T., et al., Novel X-ray image noise reduction technology reduces patint radiation dose while maintaining image quality in coronary angiography. Netherlands Heart Journal, 2015. 23(11): p. 525-530. [6] Eloot, L., et al., Novel X-ray imaging technology enables significant patient dose reduction in interventional cardiology while maintaining diagnostic image quality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2015. 86(5): p. E205-12.
[7] Faroux, L., et al., Minimizing exposure to radiation in invasive cardiology using modern dose-reduction technology: Evaluation of the real-life effects. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2018. 91(7): p. 1194-1199. [8] Gunja, A., et al., Image noise reduction technology reduces radiation in a radial-first cardiac catheterization laboratory. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 2017. 18(3): p. 197-201. [9] Kastrati, M., et al., Reducing Radiation Dose in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Using Image Noise Reduction Technology. Am J Cardiol, 2016. 118(3): p. 353-6.
[10] Nakamura, S., et al., Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention. HeartVessels, 2015. [11] Gislason-Lee, A.J., et al., Impact of latest generation cardiac interventional X-ray equipment on patient image quality and radiation dose for trans-catheter aortic valve implantations. Br J Radiol, 2016. 89(1067): p. 20160269. [12] Haas, N.A., et al., Substantial radiation reduction in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease interventions with a novel X-ray imaging technology. IJC Heart & Vasculature, 2015. 6: p. 101-109.
[13] Lauterbach, M. and K.E. Hauptmann, Reducing Patient Radiation Dose With Image Noise Reduction Technology in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Procedures. The American Journal of Cardiology, 2016. 117(5): p. 834-838. [14] Sullivan, P.M., et al., Reduction in Radiation Dose in a Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Lab Using the Philips AlluraClarity X-ray System. Pediatric Cardiology, 2017. 38(8): p. 1583-1591. [15] Dekker, L.R., et al., New image processing and noise reduction technology allows reduction of radiation exposure in complex electrophysiologic interventions while maintaining optimal image quality: a randomized clinical trial. Heart Rhythm, 2013. 10(11): p. 1678-82.
[16] van Dijk, J.D., et al., Impact of new X-ray technology on patient dose in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantations. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 2017. 48(1): p. 105-110. [17] Dave, J.K., et al., A Phantom Study and a Retrospective Clinical Analysis to Investigate the Impact of a New Image Processing Technology on Radiation Dose and Image Quality during Hepatic Embolization. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2016. 27(4): p. 593-600. [18] Durrani, R.J., et al., Radiation dose reduction utilizing noise reduction technology during uterine artery embolization: a pilot study. Clinical Imaging, 2016. 40(3): p. 378-381.
[19] Kohlbrenner, R., et al., Patient Radiation Dose Reduction during Transarterial Chemoembolization Using a Novel X-Ray Imaging Platform. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2015. 26(9): p. 1331-1338. [20] Schernthaner, R.E., et al., A new angiographic imaging platform reduces radiation exposure for patients with liver cancer treated with transarterial chemoembolization. European radiology, 2015. 25(11): p. 3255-3262. [21] Schernthaner, R.E., et al., Characteristics of a New X-Ray Imaging System for Interventional Procedures: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2018. 41(3): p. 502-508.
[22] Spink, C., et al., Noise reduction angiographic imaging technology reduces radiation dose during bronchial artery embolization. European Journal of Radiology, 2017. 97: p. 115-118. [23] Spink, C., et al., Radiation dose reduction during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt implantation using a new imaging technology. European Journal of Radiology, 2017. 86: p. 284-288. [24] Thomaere, E., et al., A new imaging technology to reduce the radiation dose during uterine fibroid embolization. Acta Radiol, 2018. 59(12): p. 1446-1450.
[25] Trunz, L.M., et al., Investigation of Radiation Dose Estimates and Image Quality Between Commercially Available Interventional Fluoroscopy Systems for Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures. Acad Radiol, 2021. 28(11): p. 1559-1569. [26] Wen, X., et al., Novel X-Ray Imaging Technology Allows Substantial Patient Radiation Reduction without Image Quality Impairment in Repetitive Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Academic Radiology, 2015. 22(11): p. 1361-1367. [27] Alsafi, A., et al., Adrenal Vein Sampling: Radiation Dose Reduction on New Angiography Platform. The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology, 2020. 4(02): p.102-106.
[28] Baumann, F., et al., The Effect of a New Angiographic Imaging Technology on Radiation Dose in Visceral Embolization Procedures. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2017.51(4): p. 183-187. [29] van den Haak, R.F., et al., Significant Radiation Dose Reduction in the Hybrid Operating Room Using a Novel X-ray Imaging Technology. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2015. 50(4): p. 480-6. [30] Kirkwood, M.L., et al., New image-processing and noise-reduction software reduces radiation dose during complex endovascular procedures. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2016. 64(5): p. 1357-1365.
[31] de Ruiter, Q.M., et al., AlluraClarity Radiation Dose-Reduction Technology in the Hybrid Operating Room During Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. J Endovasc Ther, 2016. 23(1): p. 130-8. [32] Stangenberg, L., et al., Modern Fixed Imaging Systems Reduce Radiation Exposure to Patients and Providers. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2018. 52(1): p. 52-58. [33] van Strijen, M.J., et al., Evaluation of a Noise Reduction Imaging Technology in Iliac Digital Subtraction Angiography: Noninferior Clinical Image Quality with Lower Patient and Scatter Dose. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2015. 26(5): p. 642-650.e1.
[34] Strauss, K.J., et al., Estimates of diagnostic reference levels for pediatric peripheral and abdominal fluoroscopically guided procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2015. 204(6): p. W713-9. [35] van der Marel, K., et al., Reduced Patient Radiation Exposure during Neurodiagnostic and Interventional X-Ray Angiography with a New Imaging Platform. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2017. 38(3): p. 442-449. [36] Söderman, M., et al., Image noise reduction algorithm for digital subtraction angiography: clinical results. Radiology, 2013. 269(2): p. 553-60.
[37] Söderman, M., et al., Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients. Neuroradiology, 2013. 55(11): p. 1365-1372. [38] Spink, C. et al., Radiation dose reduction during adrenal vein sampling using a new angiographic imaging technology. Scientific reports, 2022. 12(1): p. 6067-6067. [39] Wilson-Stewart, K.S., et al., Impact of dose reducing software on patient and staff temple dose during fluoroscopically guided pacemaker insertion, closure devices implantation and coronary angiography procedures. Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2022. 45(2): p. 589-599.